Alternatives to Extended Producer Responsibility: Consumer-Focused Initiatives
-
Deborah King
- EPR, Fashion, Sustainability
Introduction
Consumer-focused initiatives empower individuals to play an active role in reducing textile waste and making more intentional choices about their clothing. By emphasizing education and providing practical tools, these strategies help extend the lifespan of garments and encourage habits that push back against the fast fashion cycle. This section explores how small, mindful actions on a personal level can contribute to industry-wide sustainability efforts.
This sub-article explores the following solutions:
1. Repair Initiatives
2. Consumer Education on Sustainability and Minimalism
1. Repair Initiatives
Description
Repair initiatives focus on extending the lifecycle of garments by encouraging and enabling consumers to fix damaged clothing instead of discarding it. This approach aligns with circular economy principles, which emphasize reducing waste, reusing resources, and promoting sustainability. Repairing garments can address issues like broken zippers, missing buttons, or torn seams, keeping textiles in circulation longer and reducing the environmental and social impact of fast fashion (Jain, 2021; Stevens, 2022). Additionally, repair services that address fit issues, such as hemming pants or adjusting garments for comfort, enable consumers to extend the lifespan of their clothing. This is especially valuable in accommodating body size changes or making vintage and resale items fit seamlessly.
These initiatives can take many forms, including:
- DIY Repairs: Empowering consumers with basic sewing and mending skills through workshops, online tutorials, or repair kits provided by brands.
- Community-Based Repair: Hosting repair cafés or events where individuals can collaborate, share tools, and learn from experts to mend their clothes.
- Professional Services: Expanding access to affordable, high-quality repair services through tailors, seamstresses, or brand-led repair programs (Jain, 2021; Planet Aid, 2024)
Repair initiatives are part of the slow fashion movement, challenging the “disposable” mentality of fast fashion by cultivating a mindset of resourcefulness and intentional consumption. Visible mending, for instance, embraces imperfections, turning repaired garments into personalized, artistic statements. This trend reduces waste and builds emotional connections with clothing, encouraging longer use (Stevens, 2022; Planet Aid, 2024).
Benefits
- Reduces Textile Waste: Repairing garments keeps them out of landfills, directly reducing the environmental footprint of discarded clothing (Jain, 2021; Stevens, 2022). Clothing that no longer fits is one of the leading contributors to clothing discards, and repairs for fit problems can reduce this waste.
- Extends Garment Lifespan: Regular repairs ensure clothing stays in use longer, delaying the need for replacements and promoting sustainable consumption (Stevens, 2022; Planet Aid, 2024).
- Conserves Resources: Repairing instead of replacing helps conserve the water, energy, and raw materials required to produce new fibers and garments (Stevens, 2022).
- Empowers Consumers: Teaching basic mending skills through workshops or tutorials gives individuals the confidence to take control of their clothing maintenance, creating a sense of self-reliance and sustainability (Planet Aid, 2024).
- Supports Local Economies: Expanding access to professional repair services creates opportunities for tailors, seamstresses, and small businesses in local communities (Stevens, 2022; Planet Aid, 2024).
- Promotes Individual Creativity: Visible mending and customization allow consumers to personalize their garments, turning repairs into unique fashion statements (Planet Aid, 2024).
- Promotes Environmental Awareness: Repair initiatives encourage consumers to rethink their relationship with clothing, aligning their habits with sustainability goals and reducing overconsumption (Stevens, 2022; Planet Aid, 2024).
- Accessible and Cost-Effective: Repairs are often more affordable than purchasing new clothing, making sustainable practices more accessible to a wider range of consumers (Stevens, 2022).
Challenges
- Consumer Behavior and Mindset: Convincing consumers to repair rather than replace their clothing can be challenging in a culture dominated by convenience and fast fashion’s low prices(Jain, 2021; Stevens, 2022).
- Consumer Time Commitment: Repairing clothing takes time and effort, which may deter individuals accustomed to fast, disposable fashion options (Planet Aid, 2024).
- Access to Repair Services: Not everyone has access to affordable or skilled repair services, particularly in areas where tailoring businesses are limited or non-existent (Stevens, 2022; Planet Aid, 2024).
- Infrastructure Gaps: Establishing community repair hubs, providing tools, or organizing repair events requires initial investment and ongoing support (Stevens, 2022; Planet Aid, 2024).
- Skill Gaps: Many people lack basic mending or sewing skills, making it difficult for them to participate in DIY repair initiatives without proper education or resources (Planet Aid, 2024).
- Cost of Repairs: For inexpensive fast fashion garments, repair costs may exceed the original purchase price, discouraging consumers from opting for repairs (Jain, 2021; Stevens, 2022).
- Limited Scalability: While effective on an individual level, repair initiatives may struggle to scale across the broader industry without widespread adoption and support from brands and governments (Stevens, 2022; Planet Aid, 2024).
- Perceived Value of Repaired Clothing: Some consumers may view repaired garments as inferior or less desirable (Planet Aid, 2024).
Potential Costs
- Marketing and Awareness Campaigns: Promoting the value of repairs and encouraging consumer participation requires investment in advertising and outreach efforts.
- Material Costs: Providing repair kits or replacement components, such as buttons, zippers, or patches, can add to the costs, especially if offered free or subsidized by brands.
- Operational Costs for Events: Organizing community repair events or repair cafés involves expenses for venues, logistics, and supplies.
- Educational Programs: Hosting workshops, creating online tutorials, or providing repair kits to teach consumers mending skills incurs costs for materials, staffing, and promotion.
- Setting Up Repair Infrastructure: Establishing repair hubs, community workshops, or in-store repair stations requires investment in facilities, tools, and equipment.
- Labor Costs: Hiring skilled repair professionals, such as tailors or seamstresses, or providing on-site repair services can be expensive, especially for businesses offering free or subsidized repairs.
- Training Programs for Staff: Brands or organizations may need to train employees or volunteers to perform repairs or educate customers, which requires time and resources.
- Consumer Incentives: Offering discounts or loyalty rewards for consumers who choose repair services can encourage participation but also represents a cost to businesses.
Examples
- Repair Café Toronto is a volunteer-driven organization that hosts community events where neighbors assist each other in repairing household items, encouraging sustainability and reducing waste.
- The Guelph Tool Library, established in 2016, is a volunteer-driven, membership-based lending library that provides access to over 1,300 tools for DIY projects, gardening, construction, and more, promoting sustainability and community resilience.
- Calgary-based Gear Re-Store specializes in repairing and restoring outdoor gear, including technical apparel and equipment, to extend their lifespan and enhance performance. They offer services such as technical repairs, durable water repellency (DWR) reapplication, and gear tracking technology.
2. Consumer Education on Sustainability and Minimalism
Description
Consumer education on sustainability and minimalism empowers individuals with the knowledge and tools to make informed decisions about their clothing consumption. This approach highlights fast fashion’s environmental and social impacts while encouraging a shift toward mindful, intentional practices. Sustainability focuses on meeting the needs of the present without compromising future generations—prioritizing eco-friendly materials, ethical production methods, and minimizing waste. Minimalism complements this by promoting intentional living, where consumers embrace fewer, high-quality, versatile items that reduce clutter and waste.
Educational initiatives can be delivered through a variety of engaging platforms. Social media campaigns, webinars, and educational videos offer a quick and effective way to reach broad audiences. In-person or virtual workshops can provide hands-on learning, such as mending or upcycling skills, while retail spaces can host events or display in-store resources, like QR codes linking to sustainability tips. Collaborations with schools, non-profits, or influencers also extend the reach of educational efforts, embedding sustainability messages into existing programs or campaigns.
Benefits
- Reduction in Demand for Fast Fashion: Educated consumers are more likely to make informed choices, opting for fewer, higher-quality garments instead of cheaply made fast fashion. This shift reduces demand for mass-produced clothing and helps curb overproduction.
- Extended Product Lifespan: With knowledge of garment care, repair techniques, and upcycling, consumers can prolong the life of their clothing, reducing textile waste and creating a culture of reuse.
- Increased Environmental Awareness: Educational initiatives can inspire more significant lifestyle changes beyond fashion, making consumers more conscious of waste in other aspects of their lives.
- Empowerment Through Knowledge: By understanding the social and environmental costs of their purchases, consumers feel more empowered to align their buying decisions with their values, driving systemic change within the industry.
Challenges
- Behavioral Change: Shifting consumer habits can be slow and difficult, as many people may have grown accustomed to the convenience, affordability, and rapid turnover of fast fashion.
- Financial Accessibility: Responsibly produced fashion typically carries a higher price tag compared to fast fashion, making it less attainable for budget-conscious consumers. Changing the way one evaluates a purchase by cost per wear allows consumers to consider that a higher initial price for an item that is worn many times is comparatively cheaper than an inexpensive item discarded after only a few uses.
- Accessibility of Sustainable Options: Finding sustainable clothing can be difficult, as many smaller brands lack the resources to mass market their clothing. This can result in consumers struggling to identify brands with genuine sustainability practices amidst the greenwashing noise of fast fashion.
- Engagement Consistency: Sustaining consumer interest and participation requires ongoing education and reinforcement. Without regular touchpoints, initial enthusiasm can wane, leading to a return to old habits.
- Scope of Influence: Reaching a diverse audience with varying socioeconomic backgrounds, cultural values, and priorities is complex, especially for small brands or organizations with limited marketing budgets.
Potential Costs
While consumer education initiatives can place financial burdens on individual brands, these efforts could also be managed by external organizations such as non-profits, industry associations, or government agencies. Delivering a unified message can have more impact by reaching a broader audience, and additionally alleviate financial strain on brands. Inherent costs associated with implementing consumer education programs include the following:
- Marketing and Campaign Costs: Investment is required to design and distribute engaging campaigns.
- Resource Creation: Developing impactful educational materials—such as digital guides, videos, infographics, or in-person workshop resources—requires funding for design, development, and content expertise.
- Partnership Expenses: Collaborations with influencers, educational institutions, and sustainability advocates are key to amplifying the message but often come with associated costs, such as compensation, training, or hosting events.
- Technology Investment: Interactive tools, such as apps or educational platforms, may involve high development and maintenance costs.
- Staffing and Training: Whether through in-house teams or external partnerships, staffing and training costs are necessary for delivering workshops, managing campaigns, or interacting with audiences.
Examples:
- In 2011, Patagonia launched its “Don’t Buy This Jacket” campaign, placing a full-page ad in The New York Times on Black Friday that urged consumers to consider the environmental impact of their purchases and to buy only what they truly need.
- Fashion Revolution’s “Who Made My Clothes?” campaign encourages consumers to question brands about the origins of their garments, promoting transparency and ethical practices within the fashion industry.
- The Toronto District School Board’s EcoSchools program, launched in 2003, encourages environmental stewardship by engaging students and staff in hands-on learning and sustainability initiatives within their schools.
Conclusion
Consumer-focused initiatives play a crucial role in addressing textile waste, by empowering individuals to make thoughtful choices that extend the life of their garments. While these strategies can make a significant impact, they are just one piece of the multifaceted solution needed to tackle the textile waste crisis. To explore how these initiatives complement producer-focused alternatives and industry-wide strategies, click here to head back to the main article and discover the collective actions driving a more sustainable future for fashion.
Deborah King
Deborah is a sustainable fashion expert located in Toronto, Canada. She’s an Industrial Engineer with a post-grad in Sustainable Fashion Production. She grew up on the tiny island of Tortola in the British Virgin Islands, and has been sewing her own clothing since the age of 10. She founded Global Measure to help authentically sustainable and ethical fashion businesses stand out from the greenwashing noise through third-party certification.
Curious to explore EPR further or interested in potential collaborations? Dive into our comprehensive Case Study for a deeper understanding.
References:
Adesoga, T. O., Olaiya, O. P., Onuma, E. P., Ajayi, O. O., & Olagunju, O. D. (June, 2024). Review of reverse logistics practices and their impact on supply chain sustainability. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 12(02), 162–168. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.12.2.1216
Apparel Impact Institute. (January, 2023). Apparel Impact Institute opens first call for applications for the Climate Solutions Portfolio – A new tool to deploy grants from the $250M Fashion Climate Fund. PR Newswire. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/apparel-impact-institute-opens-first-call-for-applications-for-the-climate-solutions-portfolio—a-new-tool-to-deploy-grants-from-the-250m-fashion-climate-fund-301732824.html
Arrigo, E. (March, 2022). Digital platforms in fashion rental: A business model analysis. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 26(1), 1-20. Retrieved November 10, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-03-2020-0044
Arzaga, D. (September, 2017). All you have to do is ask: Innovation and value creation in the post-consumer apparel industry: The story of Eileen Fisher Renew (Master’s thesis, Lund University). Lund University Publications. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=8928151&fileOId=8928152
Blok, J. (February, 2024). Digital product passports: Increasing transparency in the fashion industry. TScIT, 40. University of Twente. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://essay.utwente.nl/98164/1/Blok_BA_EEMCS.pdf
Bodenheimer, M., Schuler, J., & Wilkening, T. (April, 2022). Drivers and barriers to fashion rental for everyday garments: An empirical analysis of a former fashion-rental company. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 18(1), 344-356. Retrieved November 10, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2022.2065774
Botha, S., Roccanova, A., and Sosa, L. (Sept 2021). EPR Policy: France’s National Programme for Textiles Recovery, Retrieved on May 13, 2024 from https://knowledge-hub.circle-economy.com/article/8959?n=EPR-Policy-France%27s-National-Programme-for-Textiles-Recovery
Charnley, F., Cherrington, R., Mueller, F., Jain, A., Nelson, C., Wendland, S., & Ventosa, S. (June, 2024). Retaining product value in post-consumer textiles: How to scale a closed-loop system. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 205, 107542. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107542
Chen, C. (June, 2023). Resale won’t fix fast fashion’s sustainability issues. Business of Fashion. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://www.businessoffashion.com/articles/sustainability/resale-wont-fix-fast-fashions-sustainability-issues/
Conley, T., & Botwright, K. (March, 2023). What do green subsidies mean for the future of climate and trade. World Economic Forum. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/03/what-do-green-subsides-mean-for-the-future-of-climate-and-trade-099a016307/
Franki, N. (December, 2022). Regulation of the voluntary carbon offset market: Shifting the burden of climate change mitigation from individual to collective action. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 48(1). Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.52214/cjel.v48i1.10442
Good Fashion Fund. (n.d.). Good Fashion Fund. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://goodfashionfund.com/
Gupta, I., & Sharma, R. K. (October, 2024). IIFT International Business and Management Review Journal, 1-9. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1177/jiift.241276317
International Labour Organization. (June, 2021). Greener clothes: Environmental initiatives and tools in the garment sector in Asia. Retrieved November 10, 2024, from https://www.ilo.org/publications/greener-clothes-environmental-initiatives-and-tools-garment-sector-asia
Jain, A. (March, 2021). Influence of consumption behaviours, attitudes and barriers toward clothing repair [Report]. University of Alberta Library. Retrieved November 3, 2024, from https://era.library.ualberta.ca/items/647c1be3-984b-454e-9134-c8d92bc6424a
Kelderman, N. (March, 2019). Increasing the use of recycled textiles through business models and policies: A study providing practical insights based on industry front-runners (Master’s thesis, Lund University). IIIEE, Lund University. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=8975125&fileOId=8975127
King, D. (August, 2024). Key requirements for EPR success in the Canadian fashion industry. Global Measure Inc. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://globalmeasure.org/epr-4/
Kristjónsdóttir, M. K. (November, 2019). Shaping the climate action trajectory within the fashion industry – a case study of a small medium sized enterprise [Master’s thesis, Uppsala University]. DiVA. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1334431/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Lanz, I. E., Laborda, E., Chaine, C., & Blecua, M. (March, 2024). A mapping of textile waste recycling technologies in Europe and Spain. Textiles, 4(3), 359-390. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles4030022
Mattaba, C., & Fatahi Valilai, O. (July, 2024). Enabling Sustainability and Compliance for Technological Transformation in Procurement and Supply Chain. In 7th European Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Conference. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.46254/EU07.20240199.
Milke Pavlova, I. (May, 2024). Circular Economy And Fashion Upcycling: Eliminating Waste By Bringing Unsold Apparel And Pre-Consumer Textile Waste Back To The Supply Chain [Master’s thesis, Kent State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent171526016744001
Montgomery, A. W., Lyon, T. P., & Barg, J. (June, 2024). No End in Sight? A Greenwash Review and Research Agenda. Organization & environment, 37(2), 221–256. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266231168905
Mu, X., & Li, C. (January, 2021). Research on clothing rental model under sharing economy. E3S Web of Conferences, 253, 01075. Retrieved November 10, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125301075
New York City Economic Development Corporation. (September, 2023). NYCEDC and CFDA announce 2023 Fashion Manufacturing Initiative Grant Fund recipients. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://edc.nyc/press-release/nycedc-cfda-announce-2023-fmi-grant-fund-recipients
Oelze, N., Gruchmann, T., & Brandenburg, M. (April, 2020). Motivating factors for implementing apparel certification schemes—A sustainable supply chain management perspective. Sustainability, 12(12), 4823. Retrieved November 10, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124823
Planet Aid. (November, 2024). Learning the skills of repair and mending helps extend textile use. Retrieved November 15, 2024, from https://www.planetaid.org/blog/repair-and-mending-extend-the-reuse-of-textiles
Ranasinghe, L., & Jayasooriya, V. M. (December, 2021). Ecolabelling in textile industry: A review. Resources, Environment and Sustainability, 6, 100037. Retrieved November 10, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2021.100037
Rim, H. (May, 2024). Fashion rental market makes a comeback as Gen Z and millennials revive brands like Nuuly, Rent the Runway. Forbes. Retrieved November 10, 2024, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/hyunsoorim/2024/05/28/fashion-rental-market-makes-a-comeback-as-gen-z-and-millennials-revive-brands-like-nuuly-rent-the-runway/
Sandberg, E., & Pal, R. (June, 2024). Exploring supply chain capabilities in textile-to-textile recycling – A European interview study. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 11, 100152. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2024.100152
Saif, M., Blay-Roger, R., Zeeshan, M., Bobadilla, L. F., Reina, T. R., Nawaz, M. A., & Odriozola, J. A. (August, 2024). Navigating the legislative interventions, challenges, and opportunities in revolutionizing textile upcycling/recycling processes for a circular economy. ACS Sustainable Resource Management, 1(11). Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1021/acssusresmgt.4c00242
Signoret, J., & Cieszkowsky, M. (June, 2024). To tackle climate change, governments increasingly turn to green subsidies. World Bank. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/trade/to-tackle-climate-change–governments-increasingly-turn-to-green
Stevens, C. (December, 2022). How repairing clothes slows down climate change. Earth.org. Retrieved November 3, 2024, from https://earth.org/how-repairing-clothes-slows-down-climate-change/
Stodt, F., Maisch, N., Ruf, P., Lechler, A., Riedel, O., & Reich, C. (May, 2024). Collaborative Smart Production Supply Chains with Blockchain Based Digital Product Passports. Preprints. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202402.1194.v2
Tari, A., & Trudel, R. (August, 2023). Affording disposal control: The effect of circular take-back programs on psychological ownership and valuation. Journal of Marketing, 88(4). Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429231196576
Wojnowska-Baryła, I., Bernat, K., Zaborowska, M., & Kulikowska, D. (March, 2024). The growing problem of textile waste generation—The current state of textile waste management. Energies, 17(7), 1528. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.3390/en17071528
Zhang, R., Mueller, S., Bernstein, G. L., Schulz, A., & Leake, M. (October, 2024). Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. In UIST ’24: Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Article 110, pp. 1-13). Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1145/3654777.3676395
