Executive Summary
Textile waste has increasingly become a pressing global issue, requiring innovative solutions that address its root causes. While Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) frameworks have been introduced to manage waste collection and accountability, they often fall short of addressing systemic challenges like overproduction, unsustainable consumption patterns, and the lack of effective recycling infrastructure.
To address these challenges, this article explores three categories of proposed strategies, each offering a unique approach to curbing textile waste:
Producer-Focused Alternatives
1. Sustainable Design Practices: Integrating techniques like zero-waste design, deadstock fabric use, and upcycling to eliminate pre-consumer waste and enhance efficiency.
2. Rental/Product-as-a-Service Models: Encouraging shared garment use to extend the lifecycle of clothing and reduce demand for new production.
3. Certification for Sustainable Clothing: Establishing credibility through third-party audits that verify environmental and social responsibility.
4. Incentivized Product Take-Back and Resale Programs: Offering rewards to consumers who return used garments for recycling, resale, or upcycling.
5. Subsidies and Grants for Sustainable Production: Providing financial support to brands for adopting eco-friendly practices, materials, and technologies.
6. Carbon Offset Programs: Counterbalancing emissions through investments in renewable energy, reforestation, and other climate-positive projects.
Industry-Wide Strategies
7. Post-Consumer Textile Sorting and Recycling Infrastructure: Developing large-scale systems to collect, sort, and process discarded textiles into new materials.
8. Digital Passports and Blockchain for Supply Chain Traceability: Leveraging technology to enhance transparency, accountability, and circularity in production.
Consumer-Focused Initiatives
9. Repair Initiatives: Promoting garment repairs through DIY tools, community events, and professional services to extend product lifespans.
10. Consumer Education on Sustainability: Raising awareness through workshops, campaigns, and accessible resources to foster mindful consumption.
Each of these strategies contributes uniquely to tackling the textile waste crisis, addressing challenges at the levels of production, industry systems, and consumer behavior. However, no single solution can resolve such a complex issue. A multifaceted approach—one that combines these alternatives and adapts them to the specific needs of Canada’s fashion industry—is essential for meaningful progress.
By cultivating collaboration among brands, policymakers, and consumers, we can create a more sustainable and equitable future for fashion. This collective effort is not just about waste management; it’s about transforming the industry into one that values sustainability at its core.
Introduction
In addressing the growing issue of textile waste, EPR policies have emerged as a proposed solution, championed by many non-profits for their potential to curb the environmental impact of discarded clothing and textiles. Our exploration of EPR seeks to objectively evaluate its effectiveness as a solution for textile waste, particularly within the unique landscape of Canada’s fashion industry. While EPR promises a structured approach to consolidating waste, its implementation raises critical questions about whether it can realistically reduce the volume of waste or address its root causes. As discussed in our previous article, EPR’s ability to transform or reuse this consolidated waste remains largely untapped, hindered by financial limitations affecting policymakers and industry stakeholders.
We also examined how EPR could disproportionately impact small fashion businesses, representing 98% of Canada’s fashion industry. While EPR could streamline waste collection, the financial burden of these policies could pose serious challenges for smaller, sustainable brands that lack the resources to absorb additional fees. This could unintentionally widen the gap between small businesses and fast fashion giants, whose substantial resources allow them to easily absorb additional fees. EPR could contrarily, make fast fashion more attainable and appealing to consumers by raising the cost of local, sustainable fashion, undermining the very goals it seeks to achieve.
Overview of Proposed Alternatives
In this article, we focus on alternatives that can help address the textile waste crisis at its root. Rather than focusing solely on consolidating waste, these approaches aim to prevent overproduction, increase knowledge about sustainability, and reduce the influx of excess clothing in the first place. By exploring these solutions, we hope to provide a fresh perspective on how Canada’s fashion industry can combat textile waste more effectively, encouraging sustainability across the sector while mitigating the economic pressures on small businesses.
The proposed solutions are grouped into three key categories:
1. Producer-Focused Alternatives: These approaches aim to reduce waste through sustainable design, innovative business models, and incentives for responsible production.
2. Industry-Wide Strategies: Systemic solutions that leverage infrastructure, technology, and collaboration to transform the way textiles are managed across the supply chain.
3. Consumer-Focused Initiatives: Practical and educational efforts designed to empower individuals to extend the lifespan of their garments and adopt more sustainable consumption habits.
Explore each section in detail by clicking on the hyperlinks above. Each alternative has been evaluated for its potential benefits, challenges, and relative costs, offering insights into how they could reshape Canada’s fashion industry.
High-Level Summary of Each Alternative
| Option | Description | Relative Impact* | Relative Implementation Cost** | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Producer-Focused Alternatives | ||||
| 1 | Sustainable Design Practices | Prioritizes eliminating textile waste by implementing innovative design practices and pattern-making techniques that maximize material efficiency and minimize production offcuts. | ★★★★☆ | $$ |
| 2 | Rental / Product-as-a-Service (PaaS) Models | Provides consumers with flexible access to clothing through rental services, reducing the need for overproduction while extending the lifecycle of garments. | ★★★★☆ | $$$ |
| 3 | Certification for Sustainable Clothing Options | Confirms a brand’s commitment to environmental and social responsibility through rigorous third-party audits and clear standards. | ★★★★☆ | $$$ |
| 4 | Incentivized Product Take-Back and Resale Programs | Encourages customers to return their used garments for recycling, resale, or upcycling by offering rewards like vouchers, discounts, or loyalty points. | ★★★★☆ | $$$$ |
| 5 | Subsidies and Grants for Sustainable Production | Offers financial support to brands and manufacturers, enabling the adoption of sustainable practices, materials, and technologies. | ★★★★☆ | $$$$ |
| 6 | Carbon Offset Programs | Helps brands achieve carbon neutrality by funding impactful projects such as reforestation or renewable energy initiatives that reduce or capture greenhouse gas emissions. | ★★★☆☆ | $$ |
| Industry-Wide Strategies | ||||
| 7 | Post-Consumer Textile Sorting and Recycling Infrastructure | Develops large-scale systems to process and recycle used textiles, transforming waste into valuable resources and closing the loop on fashion production. | ★★★★★ | $$$$$ |
| 8 | Digital Passports and Blockchain for Supply Chain Traceability | Utilizes secure blockchain technology to record and share comprehensive data about a garment’s journey. | ★★★★★ | $$$$$ |
| Consumer-Focused Initiatives | ||||
| 9 | Repair Initiatives | Provides consumers with tools, workshops, and services to extend the lifespan of garments by repairing rather than discarding them. | ★★★★☆ | $ |
| 10 | Consumer Education on Sustainability | Raises awareness and encourages sustainable consumption habits through workshops, campaigns, and accessible resources. | ★★★☆☆ | $ |
*Relative Impact: This category uses a 5-star scale to indicate the potential effectiveness of each option in addressing textile waste, with ★☆☆☆☆ star representing the least impact compared to other options and ★★★★★ stars representing the highest impact.
**Relative Implementation Cost: This category uses a 5-dollar sign scale to show the estimated cost of implementing each option, with $ representing the least expensive and $$$$$ representing the most expensive relative to the other alternatives.
Conclusion
Addressing textile waste requires a multifaceted approach that moves beyond the limitations of traditional EPR schemes. While EPR policies provide a framework for waste collection and accountability, they often fail to address systemic issues such as overproduction and unsustainable consumption patterns. The ten alternatives explored in this article offer a spectrum of innovative solutions, each tackling different aspects of the textile waste crisis—from empowering consumers and extending garment lifespans to leveraging technology and building infrastructure for a circular economy.
By examining these options in terms of their impact, cost, and scalability, we can see how each contributes uniquely to the goal of reducing textile waste and promoting sustainability. A single solution won’t address the issue entirely; instead, combining these strategies and customizing them to fit the unique needs of Canada’s fashion industry offers the best potential for meaningful progress. As brands, policymakers, and consumers work together to adopt these alternatives, the shift toward a more sustainable and equitable fashion future becomes increasingly attainable.
Deborah King
Deborah is a sustainable fashion expert located in Toronto, Canada. She’s an Industrial Engineer with a post-grad in Sustainable Fashion Production. She grew up on the tiny island of Tortola in the British Virgin Islands, and has been sewing her own clothing since the age of 10. She founded Global Measure to help authentically sustainable and ethical fashion businesses stand out from the greenwashing noise through third-party certification.
Curious to explore EPR further or interested in potential collaborations? Dive into our comprehensive Case Study for a deeper understanding.
References:
Adesoga, T. O., Olaiya, O. P., Onuma, E. P., Ajayi, O. O., & Olagunju, O. D. (June, 2024). Review of reverse logistics practices and their impact on supply chain sustainability. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 12(02), 162–168. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.12.2.1216
Apparel Impact Institute. (January, 2023). Apparel Impact Institute opens first call for applications for the Climate Solutions Portfolio – A new tool to deploy grants from the $250M Fashion Climate Fund. PR Newswire. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/apparel-impact-institute-opens-first-call-for-applications-for-the-climate-solutions-portfolio—a-new-tool-to-deploy-grants-from-the-250m-fashion-climate-fund-301732824.html
Arrigo, E. (March, 2022). Digital platforms in fashion rental: A business model analysis. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 26(1), 1-20. Retrieved November 10, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-03-2020-0044
Arzaga, D. (September, 2017). All you have to do is ask: Innovation and value creation in the post-consumer apparel industry: The story of Eileen Fisher Renew (Master’s thesis, Lund University). Lund University Publications. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=8928151&fileOId=8928152
Blok, J. (February, 2024). Digital product passports: Increasing transparency in the fashion industry. TScIT, 40. University of Twente. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://essay.utwente.nl/98164/1/Blok_BA_EEMCS.pdf
Bodenheimer, M., Schuler, J., & Wilkening, T. (April, 2022). Drivers and barriers to fashion rental for everyday garments: An empirical analysis of a former fashion-rental company. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 18(1), 344-356. Retrieved November 10, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2022.2065774
Botha, S., Roccanova, A., and Sosa, L. (Sept 2021). EPR Policy: France’s National Programme for Textiles Recovery, Retrieved on May 13, 2024 from https://knowledge-hub.circle-economy.com/article/8959?n=EPR-Policy-France%27s-National-Programme-for-Textiles-Recovery
Charnley, F., Cherrington, R., Mueller, F., Jain, A., Nelson, C., Wendland, S., & Ventosa, S. (June, 2024). Retaining product value in post-consumer textiles: How to scale a closed-loop system. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 205, 107542. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107542
Chen, C. (June, 2023). Resale won’t fix fast fashion’s sustainability issues. Business of Fashion. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://www.businessoffashion.com/articles/sustainability/resale-wont-fix-fast-fashions-sustainability-issues/
Conley, T., & Botwright, K. (March, 2023). What do green subsidies mean for the future of climate and trade. World Economic Forum. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/03/what-do-green-subsides-mean-for-the-future-of-climate-and-trade-099a016307/
Franki, N. (December, 2022). Regulation of the voluntary carbon offset market: Shifting the burden of climate change mitigation from individual to collective action. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 48(1). Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.52214/cjel.v48i1.10442
Good Fashion Fund. (n.d.). Good Fashion Fund. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://goodfashionfund.com/
Gupta, I., & Sharma, R. K. (October, 2024). IIFT International Business and Management Review Journal, 1-9. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1177/jiift.241276317
International Labour Organization. (June, 2021). Greener clothes: Environmental initiatives and tools in the garment sector in Asia. Retrieved November 10, 2024, from https://www.ilo.org/publications/greener-clothes-environmental-initiatives-and-tools-garment-sector-asia
Jain, A. (March, 2021). Influence of consumption behaviours, attitudes and barriers toward clothing repair [Report]. University of Alberta Library. Retrieved November 3, 2024, from https://era.library.ualberta.ca/items/647c1be3-984b-454e-9134-c8d92bc6424a
Kelderman, N. (March, 2019). Increasing the use of recycled textiles through business models and policies: A study providing practical insights based on industry front-runners (Master’s thesis, Lund University). IIIEE, Lund University. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=8975125&fileOId=8975127
King, D. (August, 2024). Key requirements for EPR success in the Canadian fashion industry. Global Measure Inc. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://globalmeasure.org/epr-4/
Kristjónsdóttir, M. K. (November, 2019). Shaping the climate action trajectory within the fashion industry – a case study of a small medium sized enterprise [Master’s thesis, Uppsala University]. DiVA. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1334431/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Lanz, I. E., Laborda, E., Chaine, C., & Blecua, M. (March, 2024). A mapping of textile waste recycling technologies in Europe and Spain. Textiles, 4(3), 359-390. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles4030022
Mattaba, C., & Fatahi Valilai, O. (July, 2024). Enabling Sustainability and Compliance for Technological Transformation in Procurement and Supply Chain. In 7th European Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Conference. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.46254/EU07.20240199.
Milke Pavlova, I. (May, 2024). Circular Economy And Fashion Upcycling: Eliminating Waste By Bringing Unsold Apparel And Pre-Consumer Textile Waste Back To The Supply Chain [Master’s thesis, Kent State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent171526016744001
Montgomery, A. W., Lyon, T. P., & Barg, J. (June, 2024). No End in Sight? A Greenwash Review and Research Agenda. Organization & environment, 37(2), 221–256. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266231168905
Mu, X., & Li, C. (January, 2021). Research on clothing rental model under sharing economy. E3S Web of Conferences, 253, 01075. Retrieved November 10, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125301075
New York City Economic Development Corporation. (September, 2023). NYCEDC and CFDA announce 2023 Fashion Manufacturing Initiative Grant Fund recipients. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://edc.nyc/press-release/nycedc-cfda-announce-2023-fmi-grant-fund-recipients
Oelze, N., Gruchmann, T., & Brandenburg, M. (April, 2020). Motivating factors for implementing apparel certification schemes—A sustainable supply chain management perspective. Sustainability, 12(12), 4823. Retrieved November 10, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124823
Planet Aid. (November, 2024). Learning the skills of repair and mending helps extend textile use. Retrieved November 15, 2024, from https://www.planetaid.org/blog/repair-and-mending-extend-the-reuse-of-textiles
Ranasinghe, L., & Jayasooriya, V. M. (December, 2021). Ecolabelling in textile industry: A review. Resources, Environment and Sustainability, 6, 100037. Retrieved November 10, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2021.100037
Rim, H. (May, 2024). Fashion rental market makes a comeback as Gen Z and millennials revive brands like Nuuly, Rent the Runway. Forbes. Retrieved November 10, 2024, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/hyunsoorim/2024/05/28/fashion-rental-market-makes-a-comeback-as-gen-z-and-millennials-revive-brands-like-nuuly-rent-the-runway/
Sandberg, E., & Pal, R. (June, 2024). Exploring supply chain capabilities in textile-to-textile recycling – A European interview study. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 11, 100152. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2024.100152
Saif, M., Blay-Roger, R., Zeeshan, M., Bobadilla, L. F., Reina, T. R., Nawaz, M. A., & Odriozola, J. A. (August, 2024). Navigating the legislative interventions, challenges, and opportunities in revolutionizing textile upcycling/recycling processes for a circular economy. ACS Sustainable Resource Management, 1(11). Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1021/acssusresmgt.4c00242
Signoret, J., & Cieszkowsky, M. (June, 2024). To tackle climate change, governments increasingly turn to green subsidies. World Bank. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/trade/to-tackle-climate-change–governments-increasingly-turn-to-green
Stevens, C. (December, 2022). How repairing clothes slows down climate change. Earth.org. Retrieved November 3, 2024, from https://earth.org/how-repairing-clothes-slows-down-climate-change/
Stodt, F., Maisch, N., Ruf, P., Lechler, A., Riedel, O., & Reich, C. (May, 2024). Collaborative Smart Production Supply Chains with Blockchain Based Digital Product Passports. Preprints. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202402.1194.v2
Tari, A., & Trudel, R. (August, 2023). Affording disposal control: The effect of circular take-back programs on psychological ownership and valuation. Journal of Marketing, 88(4). Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429231196576
Wojnowska-Baryła, I., Bernat, K., Zaborowska, M., & Kulikowska, D. (March, 2024). The growing problem of textile waste generation—The current state of textile waste management. Energies, 17(7), 1528. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.3390/en17071528
Zhang, R., Mueller, S., Bernstein, G. L., Schulz, A., & Leake, M. (October, 2024). Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. In UIST ’24: Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Article 110, pp. 1-13). Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved November 5, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1145/3654777.3676395
